From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Ferguson

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Sep 14, 2022
1:20CV596 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 14, 2022)

Opinion

1:20CV596

09-14-2022

ALBERT ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER B. FERGUSON, OFFICER LAVALLY, and OFFICER BOISSEY, Defendants.


ORDER

LORETTA C. BIGGS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on August 22, 2022, was served on the parties in this action. (ECF Nos. 59, 60.) Plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (see ECF No. 61), to which Defendant responded, (see ECF No. 64).

The Court has appropriately reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Recommendation.

The Court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Summary Judgment Motion, (ECF No. 42), is GRANTED.

A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Ferguson

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Sep 14, 2022
1:20CV596 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Anderson v. Ferguson

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER B. FERGUSON, OFFICER LAVALLY, and…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 14, 2022

Citations

1:20CV596 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 14, 2022)

Citing Cases

Zawacky v. Cnty. of Clark

And other courts have found the use of a mandibular headlock to not constitute excessive force. See, e.g.,…

Sides v. Kimbrough

. See, e.g., Anderson v. Winston-Salem Police Dep't, No. 1:20cv596, 2022 WL 3586022, at *16-17 (M.D. N.C.…