From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Board of Probation Parole

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 12, 2004
CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-4655 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 12, 2004)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-4655

February 12, 2004


ORDER


AND NOW, this ___ day of ___, 2004, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Board of Probation Parole

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 12, 2004
CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-4655 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 12, 2004)
Case details for

Anderson v. Board of Probation Parole

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD TYISHAWN ANDERSON v. BOARD OF PROBATION PAROLE, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 12, 2004

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-4655 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 12, 2004)

Citing Cases

Rambert v. Mooney

Under Pennsylvania law, the aggregation of consecutive sentences is automatic and mandatory. Anderson v.…

Rambert v. Shannon

Under Pennsylvania law, the aggregation of consecutive sentences is automatic and mandatory. Anderson v.…