From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson-El v. U.S. Parole Commission

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 11, 2006
05 Civ. 2697 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 11, 2006)

Summary

adopting report and recommendation (citing Village of Willowbrook v. Olech, 528 U.S. 562, 564 (2000) (per curiam))

Summary of this case from Bullock v. Reckenwald

Opinion

05 Civ. 2697 (JSR).

September 11, 2006


ORDER


On May 4, 2006, the Honorable Theodore H. Katz, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation in the above-captioned matter recommending that Anderson-El's petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 be denied because he cannot show that the United States Parole Commission violated any constitutional provision when it denied Anderson-El parole and set a rehearing for sixty months thereafter. On May 14, 2006, petitioner timely filed objections.

Having therefore reviewed the record and the issues de novo, and having considered the objections, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation and, for the reasons stated therein, dismisses the petition. Additionally, because the petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Further, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's order would not be taken in good faith. Clerk to enter judgment.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Anderson-El v. U.S. Parole Commission

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 11, 2006
05 Civ. 2697 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 11, 2006)

adopting report and recommendation (citing Village of Willowbrook v. Olech, 528 U.S. 562, 564 (2000) (per curiam))

Summary of this case from Bullock v. Reckenwald
Case details for

Anderson-El v. U.S. Parole Commission

Case Details

Full title:KELVIN ANDERSON-EL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 11, 2006

Citations

05 Civ. 2697 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 11, 2006)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Lockett

nes created a significant risk of increased punishment); see also Thomas v. Marberry, 318 Fed.Appx. 427,…

Bryant v. Williamson

he law applied with the law of a petitioner's choice: we must compare the guidelines applied to Petitioner…