Opinion
62PA21-1
12-09-2021
ANDERSON CREEK PARTNERS, L.P., et al. v. COUNTY OF HARNETT
James R. DeMay, Attorney at Law, Concord, For Anderson Creek Partners, L.P., et al. James E. Scarbrough, Attorney at Law, Concord, For Anderson Creek Partners, L.P., et al. Kip David Nelson, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For County of Harnett. Bradley M. Risinger, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For County of Harnett. Monica Langdon Jackson, Attorney at Law, For County of Harnett. Christopher William Appel, Attorney at Law, For County of Harnett. Madeline J. Trilling, Attorney at Law, Concord, For Anderson Creek Partners, L.P., et al. John F. Scarbrough, Attorney at Law, Concord, For Anderson Creek Partners, L.P., et al. Troy D. Shelton, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For County of Harnett. Erin Elizabeth Wilcox, Attorney at Law, For Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. J. Michael Carpenter, General Counsel, For Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. F. Paul Calamita, III, Attorney at Law, For NC Water Quality Association, et al.
James R. DeMay, Attorney at Law, Concord, For Anderson Creek Partners, L.P., et al.
James E. Scarbrough, Attorney at Law, Concord, For Anderson Creek Partners, L.P., et al.
Kip David Nelson, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For County of Harnett.
Bradley M. Risinger, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For County of Harnett.
Monica Langdon Jackson, Attorney at Law, For County of Harnett.
Christopher William Appel, Attorney at Law, For County of Harnett.
Madeline J. Trilling, Attorney at Law, Concord, For Anderson Creek Partners, L.P., et al.
John F. Scarbrough, Attorney at Law, Concord, For Anderson Creek Partners, L.P., et al.
Troy D. Shelton, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For County of Harnett.
Erin Elizabeth Wilcox, Attorney at Law, For Pacific Legal Foundation, et al.
J. Michael Carpenter, General Counsel, For Pacific Legal Foundation, et al.
F. Paul Calamita, III, Attorney at Law, For NC Water Quality Association, et al.
Amended
The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief filed on the 8th of December 2021 by Plaintiffs:
"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of December 2021."
Plaintiffs shall have up to and including the 20th day of December 2021 to file and serve his/her reply brief with this Court.