From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderjaska v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 29, 2021
19 CIVIL 3057 (LTS)(GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2021)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 3057 (LTS)(GWG)

12-29-2021

JOHN ANDERJASKA, CHUNGYAO CHEN, TEENA COLEBROOK, JOEL GRIFFITH, ART HEINEMAN, CALVIN WILLIAMS, CHARLES WITTE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., CAPITAL ONE, N.A., CITIBANK, N.A., J.P. MORGAN CHASE, N.A., WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendants.


RULE 54(b) JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated December 29, 2021, final judgment is entered in favor of defendants Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and Capital One, N.A., only, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). The Court finds, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that there is no just reason for delay, and final judgment is hereby entered.


Summaries of

Anderjaska v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 29, 2021
19 CIVIL 3057 (LTS)(GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Anderjaska v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN ANDERJASKA, CHUNGYAO CHEN, TEENA COLEBROOK, JOEL GRIFFITH, ART…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 29, 2021

Citations

19 CIVIL 3057 (LTS)(GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2021)