From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anastacio v. Haug

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 2002
295 A.D.2d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

01-01997

Argued April 26, 2002

June 3, 2002

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), dated December 18, 2000, as denied their motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on their cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 240(1).

Friedman Friedman, New York, N.Y. (Daniel J. Friedman of counsel), for appellants.

Jacobowitz, Garfinkel Lesman, New York, N.Y. (Carol A. Moore of counsel), for defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents.

James P. O'Connor (Clark Maffei, New York, N.Y. [Robert D. Clark] of counsel), for third-party defendant-respondent.

MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, SANDRA L. TOWNES, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

There are triable issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment.

ALTMAN, J.P., SCHMIDT, TOWNES and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Anastacio v. Haug

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 2002
295 A.D.2d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Anastacio v. Haug

Case Details

Full title:RAMON ANASTACIO, ET AL., appellants, v. DOROTHY H. HAUG, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 3, 2002

Citations

295 A.D.2d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
742 N.Y.S.2d 900