From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anandham v. Anandham

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Nov 3, 2016
NO. 09-16-00361-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 3, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 09-16-00361-CV

11-03-2016

JEEVA ANANDHAM, Appellant v. AMBIKA ANANDHAM, Appellee


On Appeal from the 317th District Court Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. C-226,683

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 7, 2016, we notified the parties that the notice of appeal was filed late, but within the extension time permitted by Rule 26.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. The appellant, Jeeva Anandham, did not respond to the Court's notices and did not file a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal.

The Court finds that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. No motion for extension of time was timely filed pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. The Court finds it is without jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

/s/_________

CHARLES KREGER

Justice Submitted on November 2, 2016
Opinion Delivered November 3, 2016 Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.


Summaries of

Anandham v. Anandham

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Nov 3, 2016
NO. 09-16-00361-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 3, 2016)
Case details for

Anandham v. Anandham

Case Details

Full title:JEEVA ANANDHAM, Appellant v. AMBIKA ANANDHAM, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Nov 3, 2016

Citations

NO. 09-16-00361-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 3, 2016)