From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bingying An v. Barr

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 10, 2020
No. 15-72794 (9th Cir. Aug. 10, 2020)

Opinion

No. 15-72794

08-10-2020

BINGYING AN, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Agency No. A088-285-457 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Bingying An, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's ("IJ") decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture ("CAT"). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency's factual findings. Guo v. Sessions, 897 F.3d 1208, 1212 (9th Cir. 2018). We grant in part and deny in part the petition for review, and we remand.

As to asylum and withholding of removal, the record compels the conclusion that the cumulative harm An suffered in China rose to the level of persecution. See id. at 1213-17 (finding petitioner suffered past persecution because of his religious beliefs where he was detained, beaten, forced to sign a document promising not to attend a home church, and required to report to the police weekly); see also Guo v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1194, 1203 (9th Cir. 2004) (totality of the circumstances compelled finding of persecution). Thus, we grant the petition for review as to An's asylum and withholding of removal claims, and remand to the agency for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. See Guo, 897 F.3d at 1217; see also INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam).

In his opening brief, An does not challenge the BIA's determination that he did not preserve for appeal the IJ's denial of his CAT claim. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir. 1996) ("Issues raised in a brief that are not supported by argument are deemed abandoned."). Thus, we deny the petition for review as to relief under CAT.

The government shall bear the costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED in part; DENIED in part; REMANDED.


Summaries of

Bingying An v. Barr

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 10, 2020
No. 15-72794 (9th Cir. Aug. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Bingying An v. Barr

Case Details

Full title:BINGYING AN, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 10, 2020

Citations

No. 15-72794 (9th Cir. Aug. 10, 2020)