Amr v. Virginia State Univ.

Full title: SALAME M. AMR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY…

Court: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 19, 2012

469 F. App'x 208 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-2051

03-19-2012

SALAME M. AMR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY "VSU"; VSU's Board of Visitors; EDDIE N. MOORE, JR.; W. ERIC THOMAS; PAMELA LEIGH-MACK; LARRY C. BROWN; KEITH M. WILLIAMSON; NASSER RASHIDI; GERALD BURTON; DONNA CRAWFORD; GLORIA YOUNG; ALI MOHAMED; OLIVER W. HILL, JR.; WONDI MERSIE; ANDREW KANU; STEPHAN WILDEUS; SHARON EVANS; AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION; AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS, Defendants - Appellees.

Salame M. Amr, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Clayton Fleming, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Ronald Nicholas Regnery, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Robert R. Musick, THOMPSON MCMULLAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Margaret Sander, REED SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Jeremy David Capps, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00787-REP-MHL)

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Salame M. Amr, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Clayton Fleming, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Ronald Nicholas Regnery, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Robert R. Musick, THOMPSON MCMULLAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Margaret Sander, REED SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Jeremy David Capps, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Salame M. Amr appeals the district court's orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint with prejudice and granting the Defendants' motions for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Amr v. Virginia State Univ., No. 3:10-cv-00787-REP-MHL (E.D. Va. Sept. 21, 2011). Amr's pending motion to hold appeal in abeyance is denied as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED