From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amo v. Little Rapids Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 17, 2000
275 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

August 17, 2000.

Motion for clarification.


DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted, without costs, to the extent of amending the decision and order dated and entered January 13, 2000, by substituting the first sentence of the second to last paragraph of the majority's decision with the following sentence: "We have reviewed the parties contentions which challenge Supreme Court's rulings on issues related to damages and find them to be unpersuasive, each of said rulings to be well within the sound discretion of the court." In addition, the second sentence of said second to last paragraph is amended to read as follows: "However, inasmuch as we are remitting for a new trial on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), it is also necessary to reverse the judgment of Supreme Court entered January 7, 1999, declaring that Laframboise is entitled, on its cross claim against MRL, to common-law indemnification from MRL".


Summaries of

Amo v. Little Rapids Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 17, 2000
275 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Amo v. Little Rapids Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CHRIS S. AMO, Respondent, v. LITTLE RAPIDS CORPORATION ET AL., Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Aug 17, 2000

Citations

275 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
713 N.Y.S.2d 295