From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ammari v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2013
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00867-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00867-LJO-SAB

01-17-2013

NAIEL AMMARI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADDRESSING DEFENDANTS'

OBJECTION TO THE ORDER CONTINUING

THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

On December 14, 2012, an order issued setting the settlement conference in this action for February 7, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. On December 17, 2012, Defendants filed an objection stating that defense counsel would be unavailable on the date set for the conference and requesting that the conference be continued until late March or early April. There is no need to file an objection to the settlement conference date. Defense counsel is advised that should a hearing date set by the court need to be moved, counsel should coordinate with the parties in the action to obtain available dates. Counsel should then contact the courtroom deputy who will check the court calendar and issue a minute order resetting the hearing. The courtroom clerk will then advise if there is a need to file a motion or objection to a set settlement date.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order, defense counsel shall contact Mamie Hernandez at 559-499-5672 with alternate dates for the settlement conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Stanley A. Boone

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Ammari v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2013
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00867-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Ammari v. California

Case Details

Full title:NAIEL AMMARI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 17, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00867-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2013)