From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

AMIR-SHRF. v. Hawkins

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Oct 1, 2009
No. 05-08-01388-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 1, 2009)

Opinion

No. 05-08-01388-CV

Opinion issued October 1, 2009.

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 07-09393-E.

Before Chief Justice THOMAS and Justices O'NEILL and MURPHY.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant Lakeith Amir-Sharif appeals the trial court's judgment dismissing the case for want of prosecution and the trial court's failure to grant appellant's motion to reinstate.

After reviewing the record, we questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal. By letter dated August 31, 2009, we notified appellant of this Court's concern regarding its jurisdiction over this appeal and directed appellant to file a letter brief regarding the jurisdictional question by September 10, 2009 and directed appellee to file any response to appellant's letter brief by September 17, 2009, at which time the Court would resolve the jurisdictional question. Appellant filed a brief on September 21, 2009.

We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The law is well settled and we therefore issue this memorandum opinion. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 47.1.

Pursuant to rule of civil procedure 165a and the court's inherent power, on August 7, 2008 the trial court signed an order of dismissal for want of prosecution for appellant's "having failed to take actions heretofore specified by the Court within the time period prescribed, and for failing to announce for trial scheduled for August 4, 2008." On August 21, 2008, appellant filed an unverified "Motion to Reinstate Complaint."

Appellant filed his notice of appeal on October 13, 2008, more than thirty days after the August 7, 2008 order of dismissal. Because his motion to reinstate was not verified, the notice of appeal was due 30 days after the dismissal order was signed. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 165a(3) (motion to reinstate shall be verified by the movant or his attorney); Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. An unverified motion to reinstate does not extend the trial court's plenary power or the deadline for appealing the dismissal of the case. McConnell v. May, 800 S.W.2d 194, 194 (Tex. 1990) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); Macarangal v. Andrews, 838 S.W.2d 632, 633 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1992, orig. proceeding); Sierra Club v. Tex. Comm'n on Envtl. Quality, 188 S.W.3d 220, 223 (Tex. App.-Austin 2005, no pet.).

We conclude appellant's notice of appeal was untimely. We therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal.

We note a prior appeal of this appellant was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the identical basis. See Amir-Sharif v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co., No. 05-07-01254-CV, 2009 WL 104777, at *1 (Tex. App.-Dallas Jan. 16, 2009, no pet.).

We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1.


Summaries of

AMIR-SHRF. v. Hawkins

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Oct 1, 2009
No. 05-08-01388-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 1, 2009)
Case details for

AMIR-SHRF. v. Hawkins

Case Details

Full title:LAKEITH AMIR-SHARIF, Appellant v. CATHY JONETTE HAWKINS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Oct 1, 2009

Citations

No. 05-08-01388-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 1, 2009)