From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amico v. Melville Volunteer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 24, 2007
39 A.D.3d 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-02634.

April 24, 2007.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), entered February 24, 2006, which granted the motion of the defendant Melville Volunteer Fire Company, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Tantone Gulotta, Ronkonkoma, N.Y. (Anthony J. Gulotta of counsel), for appellant.

Furey, Furey, Leverage, Manzione, Williams Darlington, P.C., Hempstead, N.Y. (Susan Weihs Darlington of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Crane, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Dillon, JJ.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion of the defendant Melville Volunteer Fire Company, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it is denied as premature, with leave to renew upon completion of discovery.

A party should be afforded a reasonable opportunity to conduct discovery prior to the determination of a motion for summary judgment ( see Urcan v Cocarelli, 234 AD2d 537). Here, the plaintiff has not had an adequate opportunity to conduct discovery, and the motion by the defendant Melville Volunteer Fire Company, Inc., should have been denied as premature ( see CPLR 3212 [f]; Fazio v Brandywine Realty Trust, 29 AD3d 939; Juseinoski v New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Queens, 29 AD3d 636; Manufacturers Traders Trust Co. v North Fork Bank, 16 AD3d 467).


Summaries of

Amico v. Melville Volunteer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 24, 2007
39 A.D.3d 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Amico v. Melville Volunteer

Case Details

Full title:FRANK AMICO, Appellant, v. MELVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 24, 2007

Citations

39 A.D.3d 784 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 3639
832 N.Y.S.2d 813

Citing Cases

Venables v. Sagona

The remaining contentions advanced by the defendants in support of their motion are raised prematurely. "A…

In re Linich

The principal basis for objectant's position that proponent's motion is premature is the denial of a…