From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amezquita v. Starbucks Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 15, 2013
Case No. 2:11-CV-02104-MCE-AC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CV-02104-MCE-AC

01-15-2013

SARAH AMEZQUITA, an individual, Plaintiff, v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation; and DOES 1- 10, inclusive, Defendants.

Reza Sina (SBN 250428) SINA LAW GROUP Theodore F. Monroe (SBN 150317) LAW OFFICES OF THEODORE F. MONROE Attorneys for Plaintiff Sarah Amezquita


Reza Sina (SBN 250428)
SINA LAW GROUP
Theodore F. Monroe (SBN 150317)
LAW OFFICES OF THEODORE F. MONROE
Attorneys for Plaintiff Sarah Amezquita

ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

ORDER

Based on the Stipulation of the Parties (ECF No. 10) and good cause having been shown, this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Amezquita v. Starbucks Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 15, 2013
Case No. 2:11-CV-02104-MCE-AC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Amezquita v. Starbucks Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SARAH AMEZQUITA, an individual, Plaintiff, v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 15, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CV-02104-MCE-AC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2013)