From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ames v. Virga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 6, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-3197 KJM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-3197 KJM JFM (PC)

06-06-2013

BRYON AMES, Plaintiff, v. TIM VIRGA, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed February 27, 2013, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a third amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a third amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

______________________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Ames v. Virga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 6, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-3197 KJM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Ames v. Virga

Case Details

Full title:BRYON AMES, Plaintiff, v. TIM VIRGA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 6, 2013

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-3197 KJM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2013)