From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ames v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AMARILLO DIVISION
Mar 19, 2012
2:10-CV-0244 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 19, 2012)

Opinion

2:10-CV-0244

03-19-2012

ORLANDO AMES III, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION,

REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER,

and REMANDING FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION

Came for consideration plaintiff's appeal of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying plaintiff disability benefits. On March 13, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation, recommending therein that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and the case remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative action. Both plaintiff and defendant have given notice that they do not object to the decision made in the Report and Recommendation.

The undersigned United States District Judge has made an independent examination of the record in this case. The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Accordingly, the Commissioner's administrative decision finding plaintiff not disabled is REVERSED, and the decision is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, including but not limited to all action specified and recommended to be taken on remand.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

MARY LOU ROBINSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ames v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AMARILLO DIVISION
Mar 19, 2012
2:10-CV-0244 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Ames v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ORLANDO AMES III, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AMARILLO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 19, 2012

Citations

2:10-CV-0244 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 19, 2012)

Citing Cases

Delacotera v. Colvin

Other courts presented with this exact language found this procedural mistake was not harmless and required…

Delacotera v. Berryhill

The Court cannot find misapplication of the burden of proof harmless."), report & recommendation adopted, No.…