From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ames True Temper, Inc. v. Myers Industries, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 30, 2007
Civil Action No. 05-1694 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 30, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-1694.

November 30, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2007, after the plaintiff, Ames True Temper, filed a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 60(b)(3), to reopen the case and for leave to file an amended complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a), and a motion for leave to take discovery in connection with its Rule 60(b)(3) motion, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by plaintiff and the response to those objections filed by defendant, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 60(b)(3), to reopen the case and for leave to file an amended complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a) [Doc. 21], is denied, and that plaintiff's motion for leave to take discovery in connection with its Rule 60(b)(3) motion [Doc. 30], is also denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire(s) to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Ames True Temper, Inc. v. Myers Industries, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 30, 2007
Civil Action No. 05-1694 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 30, 2007)
Case details for

Ames True Temper, Inc. v. Myers Industries, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AMES TRUE TEMPER, INC., Plaintiff, v. MYERS INDUSTRIES, INC., LISTO…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 30, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-1694 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 30, 2007)

Citing Cases

Rusk v. N.Y. State Thruway Auth.

Some require that the movant make a "colorable" claim of fraud, while others appear to require a prima facie…

Invision Architecture, Ltd. v. Anderzhon

Several courts have denied jurisdictional discovery to a party who did not seek such discovery until after…