Summary
filing a motion for leave to file late answer defeated motion for default
Summary of this case from Richardson v. JonesOpinion
Case No. 1:06-cv-840.
October 4, 2007
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed August 29, 2007 (Doc. 21).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.
Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation correct.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is DENIED as MOOT.