From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

American Trust Co. v. Ford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 12, 1912
122 P. 186 (Okla. 1912)

Opinion

No. 3140

Opinion Filed March 12, 1912.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Failure to File Briefs. A case will be dismissed in this court on motion where counsel for plaintiffs in error file no briefs within the time, and no stipulation in reference thereto is made, and no extension is either asked or allowed, when such motion is properly served and filed asking such dismissal.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from District Court, Marshall County; A. H. Ferguson, Judge.

Action between the American Trust Company and others and Sallie Ford and Jackson Lewis. From the judgment, the American Trust Company and others bring error. Dismissed.

Rennie, Hocker Moore and Kennamer Coakley, for plaintiffs in error.

Geo. Rider and E. S. Hurt, for defendants in error.


A motion to dismiss has been filed in this cause by defendants in error on several grounds, one of which is that plaintiffs in error have failed to file a brief within the time prescribed by rule of this court. Although the motion to dismiss was duly served upon counsel for plaintiffs in error, no response thereto has been made, and up to the time of the consideration of this motion plaintiffs in error are still in default in filing briefs, and have attempted to make no showing for an extension of time for that purpose.

It follows that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Horner et al. v. Goltry Sons, 23 Okla. 905, 101 P. 1111; M., O. G. Ry. Co. v. Wortman, 27 Okla. 455, 112 P. 1017.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

American Trust Co. v. Ford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Mar 12, 1912
122 P. 186 (Okla. 1912)
Case details for

American Trust Co. v. Ford

Case Details

Full title:AMERICAN TRUST CO. et al. v. FORD et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Mar 12, 1912

Citations

122 P. 186 (Okla. 1912)
122 P. 186

Citing Cases

Maness v. Wilson

"Motions presented to the trial court, the rulings thereon, and exceptions thereto, are not properly a part…

Davison v. Renner

Mullen v. Dunn (Cal.) 66 P. 209. In American Trust Co. v. Ford, 31 Okla. 628, 122 P. 186, the case was…