Opinion
2021-03399 2020-04162
06-01-2021
American Transit Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Samuel O. Espinal, Defendant-Appellant, 41 Road Rehab Acupuncture PLLC, et al., Defendants. Index No. 156303/19 Appeal No. 13963
The Tadchiev Law Firm, P.C., Fresh Meadows (Simon B. Landsberg of counsel), for appellant. Law Office of Daniel J. Tucker, Brooklyn (Ethan A. Rothschild of counsel), for respondent.
The Tadchiev Law Firm, P.C., Fresh Meadows (Simon B. Landsberg of counsel), for appellant.
Law Office of Daniel J. Tucker, Brooklyn (Ethan A. Rothschild of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Gische, J.P., Webber, Singh, Kennedy, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Nancy M. Bannon, J.), entered on or about August 14, 2020, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment against defendant Samuel O. Espinal and declared that plaintiff was not obligated to pay no-fault benefits to Espinal, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the order vacated, and the matter remanded for further proceedings.
Espinal's opposition to the summary judgment motion was timely filed in accordance with CPLR 2214(b). Since the motion court granted plaintiff's motion on the ground that Espinal failed to submit opposition papers, and therefore did not reach the merits of the motion, the matter is remanded for the motion court to consider the merits of the summary judgment motion in the first instance (see Fomina v DUB Realty, LLC, 156 A.D.3d 539, 540 [1st Dept 2017]; Commissioner of the State Ins. Fund v Weissman, 90 A.D.3d 417, 418 [1st Dept 2011]).