From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

American Slicing Machine Company v. Corkedale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1914
165 App. Div. 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Opinion

November, 1914.

Present — Jenks, P.J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ.


Although we have repeatedly called attention to the rule requiring appellant to state facts showing that the appeal is a meritorious one, there has been no attempt to comply with this rule. In addition, no excuse is offered for appellant's laches. The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

American Slicing Machine Company v. Corkedale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1914
165 App. Div. 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Case details for

American Slicing Machine Company v. Corkedale

Case Details

Full title:American Slicing Machine Company, Appellant, v. Maxwell Corkedale…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1914

Citations

165 App. Div. 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
149 N.Y.S. 1069

Citing Cases

Realty Company v. Surety Company

State ex rel. v. Gas Light Co., 102 Mo. 472; People v. O'Brien, 111 N.Y. 1; St. Ry. Co. v. Detroit, 64 F.…