From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

American Produce, LLC v. Vargas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 18, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02919-PAB-MEH (D. Colo. May. 18, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02919-PAB-MEH

05-18-2012

AMERICAN PRODUCE, LLC, a limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. FELIX RIVERA VARGAS, an individual, a/k/a Felix Rivera, JOHN M. LUNA, an individual, and RICARDO FELIX RIVERA, an individual, a/k/a Ricardo Felix, Defendants.


Judge Philip A. Brimmer


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty filed on April 24, 2012 [Docket No. 34]. The Recommendation states that objections to the Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after its service on the parties. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Recommendation was served on April 27, 2012. No party has objected to the Recommendation.

In the absence of an objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge's recommendation under any standard it deems appropriate. See Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) ("[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings"). In this matter, the Court has reviewed the Recommendation to satisfy itself that there is "no clear error on the face of the record." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes. Based on this review, the Court has concluded that the Recommendation is a correct application of the facts and the law. Accordingly, it is

This standard of review is something less than a "clearly erroneous or contrary to law" standard of review, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), which in turn is less than a de novo review. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 34] is ACCEPTED.

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Against Defendants John M. Luna and Ricardo Felix Rivera a/k/a Ricardo Felix [Docket No. 17] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:

Upon entry of final judgment in this case, judgment shall be entered in favor of plaintiff American Produce, LLC, and against defendant John M. Luna for the principal sum of $59,468.25, pre-judgment finance charges calculated at the rate of 1.5% per month through February 13, 2012 in the cumulative amount of $7,880.93, pre-judgment finance charges beginning on February 14, 2012 and continuing through the date judgment is entered at the rate of $29.33 per day, costs in the amount of $490.00, attorney's fees in the amount of $4,540.00, and post-judgment finance charges at the rate specified in 28 U.S.C. § 1961 until the total amount is satisfied.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

American Produce, LLC v. Vargas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 18, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02919-PAB-MEH (D. Colo. May. 18, 2012)
Case details for

American Produce, LLC v. Vargas

Case Details

Full title:AMERICAN PRODUCE, LLC, a limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. FELIX…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: May 18, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02919-PAB-MEH (D. Colo. May. 18, 2012)

Citing Cases

Motto Franchising, LLC v. McCabe

Upon review of the Motion and the Affidavit, the Court finds that the nontaxable fees requested were…