Opinion
Case No. 20090587-CA.
Filed September 17, 2009. Not For Official Publication
Appeal from the Fourth District, American Fork Department, 095102744 The Honorable Howard H. Maetani.
Dorothy Durrant, Lehi, Appellant Pro Se.
Before Judges Bench, Orme, and McHugh.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Dorothy Durrant appeals her speeding conviction. This is before the court on its own motion for summary disposition based on the lack of a substantial question for review.
Durrant asserts that the ticketing officer gave false testimony and that his entire testimony should have been disregarded. Essentially, she challenges the officer's credibility. It is the fact finder's role to determine the credibility of witnesses. See State v. Workman, 852 P.2d 981, 984 (Utah 1993). Generally, "a reviewing court may not reassess credibility." Id. Because matters of credibility are beyond the reach of this court and there are no other issues raised, there is no substantial question for review meriting further consideration by this court.
Affirmed.
Russell W. Bench, Judge, Gregory K. Orme, Judge, Carolyn B. McHugh, Judge.