From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

American Dairy Queen Corp. v. Blume

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jan 12, 2012
Civ. No. 11-358 (RHK/TNL) (D. Minn. Jan. 12, 2012)

Opinion

Civ. No. 11-358 (RHK/TNL)

01-12-2012

American Dairy Queen Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Guy A. Blume, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The Court having inadvertently directed the entry of judgment in its Order of January 11, 2012 (Doc. No. 76), IT IS ORDERED that the Order (Doc. No. 76) is VACATED. It is further ORDERED, based upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Leung (Doc. No. 63) and all the files, records, and proceedings herein:

1. Defendants' Objections (Doc. No. 67) to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED;

2. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety;

3. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter, Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue and Dismiss Case as Frivolous Lack of Standing (Doc. No. 34) is DENIED;

4. Defendants' Motion to Strike Answers (Doc. No. 37) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

5. Pursuant to the Order to Show Cause (Doc. No. 48), the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to ENTER DEFAULT against Defendants Blume Investments, LLC and Royal Professional Solutions, LLC, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a).

_________________

RICHARD H. KYLE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

American Dairy Queen Corp. v. Blume

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jan 12, 2012
Civ. No. 11-358 (RHK/TNL) (D. Minn. Jan. 12, 2012)
Case details for

American Dairy Queen Corp. v. Blume

Case Details

Full title:American Dairy Queen Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Guy A. Blume, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jan 12, 2012

Citations

Civ. No. 11-358 (RHK/TNL) (D. Minn. Jan. 12, 2012)