From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

American Cyanamid Company v. Wayne

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Mar 21, 2000
19 N.J. Tax 46 (Tax 2000)

Summary

requiring stabilization in a tax appeal valuation context "regardless of what actual market conditions might reflect as of the date of valuation"

Summary of this case from Glenpointe Assocs. v. Twp. of Teaneck

Opinion

Argued March 7, 2000

Decided March 21, 2000

Before Judges PRESSLER, KIMMELMAN and CIANCIA.

On appeal from the Tax Court of New Jersey, Passaic County.

Richard L. Plotkin, for appellant, ( Pitney, Hardin, Kipp Szuch, attorneys; Mr. Plotkin, Christopher J. Stracco and Gregory J. Kerr, on the brief).

Heather A. Turnbull, for respondent, ( Skoloff Wolfe, attorneys; Saul A. Wolfe, of counsel; Mr. Wolfe and Ms. Turnbull, on the brief).


This appeal relates to 1996 assessment of four lots in Wayne, New Jersey, formerly used as the corporate headquarters for the plaintiff corporation. Plaintiff only appeals assessments placed on three of the lots, specifically, Lots 1, 2, and 3 in Block 3703. American Home Products bought out plaintiff in 1994. Use of the property gradually declined thereafter and by 1996 the property was vacant.

The factual background of this matter is fully set forth in Judge Kuskin's opinion reported at 17 N.J. Tax 542 (Tax 1998). Plaintiff sought a reduction in the local property assessments. The aggregate amount of the assessments placed on the three lots under appeal was $51,070,900. Defendant counterclaimed seeking an increase in such assessments.

Trial in the matter was held before the Hon. Maureen Dougherty. Judge Dougherty resigned from the Tax Court at the conclusion of the trial and the case was reassigned to Judge Kuskin. Post-trial briefs were submitted to him. While Judge Kuskin did hold a hearing with counsel, he relied mainly on the record submitted to him to decide the case. After a complete and thorough analysis of the evidence and the factual presentations of counsel, Judge Kuskin reduced the aggregate assessment to $46,945,800.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and are satisfied that the judgment of the Tax Court should be affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Kuskin in his reported opinion.


Summaries of

American Cyanamid Company v. Wayne

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Mar 21, 2000
19 N.J. Tax 46 (Tax 2000)

requiring stabilization in a tax appeal valuation context "regardless of what actual market conditions might reflect as of the date of valuation"

Summary of this case from Glenpointe Assocs. v. Twp. of Teaneck
Case details for

American Cyanamid Company v. Wayne

Case Details

Full title:AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF WAYNE…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Mar 21, 2000

Citations

19 N.J. Tax 46 (Tax 2000)

Citing Cases

Westwood Lanes, Inc. v. Borough

See American Cyanamid Co. v. Township of Wayne, 17 N.J.Tax 542, 560-61 (Tax 1998) (stating that "[b]ased upon…

Venture 17 v. Hasbrouck Heights

Moreover, sale of property will not indicate or corroborate property tax valuations where the seller had…