From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amato v. Pathmark, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 2001
289 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Nos. 2000-06703 2000-08142

Argued September 6, 2001.

December 17, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated April 5, 2000, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside, on the ground of inadequacy, the verdict on the issue of damages, and (2), as limited by their brief, on the ground of inadequacy, from so much of a judgment of the same court, entered July 11, 2000, as awarded them only $5,000 against Pathmark, Inc., d/b/a Pathmark of Boro Park.

Bruno, Gerbino Macchia, LLP, Melville, N.Y. (Daniel Hardick and Steven D. Brower of counsel), for appellants.

Kral, Clerkin, Redmond, Ryan, Perry Girvan, New York, N Y (Mary L. Maloney and Elizabeth Kastner of counsel), for respondent.

Before: GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, HOWARD MILLER, SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, with one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248).

The plaintiffs' appeal from the judgment is academic, in light of our determination on the appeal from the judgment by the defendant Pathmark, Inc., d/b/a Pathmark of Boro Park, in Amato v. Pathmark (A.D.2d [decided herewith]).

GOLDSTEIN, J.P., McGINITY, H. MILLER and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Amato v. Pathmark, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 2001
289 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Amato v. Pathmark, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD AMATO, et al., appellants, v. PATHMARK, INC., d/b/a PATHMARK OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 17, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
734 N.Y.S.2d 868