Amador v. Hickman

Full title: JOSE GUADALUPE AMADOR, Petitioner, v. R. Q. HICKMAN (Warden), Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Sep 23, 2010

CV 00-5558-AHM(CW) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2010)

Opinion

JOSE GUADALUPE AMADOR, Petitioner, v. R. Q. HICKMAN (Warden), Respondent. No. CV 00-5558-AHM(CW). United States District Court, C.D. California. September 23, 2010.

          ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          A. HOWARD MATZ, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has reviewed the entire record in this action, as well as the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been received.

         IT IS ORDERED: (1) that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge be accepted; and (2) that judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order and the judgment herein be served on the parties.