Amado v. Dickinson

Full title: ROBERT AMADO, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN DICKINSON, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jan 24, 2011

CV 08-02082 ODW (SS) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2011)

Opinion

ROBERT AMADO, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN DICKINSON, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 08-02082 ODW (SS) United States District Court, C.D. California. January 24, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          OTIS D. WRIGHT, II District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.