Amadasu v. Rosenberg

Full title: Darlington AMADASU, MD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret ROSENBERG, MD…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: May 30, 2007

225 F. App'x 32 (2d Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 05-3613-cv.

May 30, 2007.

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Lewis A. Kaplan, Judge).

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Darlington Amadasu, pro se.

Nancy V. Wright, Ricki E. Roer, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman Dicker LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellees Margaret Rosenberg, MD, Neil Caiman, MD, Milton A. Gumbs, MD, Miguel A. Fuentes, Jr., Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center, Institute for Urban Family Health, Inc., Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman Dicker, Laura M. Alfredo, Erika Stein, and Ricki E. Roer.

Christopher Hitchcock, Ohrenstein Brown, LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellee Clifford F. Zelen.

Lee Nuwesra, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellee Duncan A. Quarless.

Jonathan B. Bruno, Kaufman, Borgest Ryan, LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellee Marcy P. Schaffer.

Claudia J. Charles, Martin Clearwater Bell LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellees Joseph J. Andriola and Marshall, Conway Wright, P.C.

PRESENT: WALKER, JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judges, and RICHARD M. BERMAN District Judge.^_

_ The Honorable Richard M. Berman, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff Darlington Amadasu appeals pro se from a judgment of April 29, 2005, entered pursuant to decisions of the District Court denying his motions for default and dismissing his amended complaint. The District Court's decisions adopted Reports and Recommendations prepared by Chief Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck. See Amadasu v. Rosenberg, No. 03 Civ. 6450, 2005 WL 954916 (S.D.N.Y. Apr.26, 2005); Amadasu v. Rosenberg, No. 03 Civ. 6450, 2004 WL 925811 (S.D.N.Y. Apr.30, 2004). Plaintiff's amended complaint alleged numerous violations of state and federal law arising out of his dismissal from positions at Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center and the Institute for Urban Family Health. We assume the parties' familiarity with the facts, the issues on appeal and the procedural history.

Having carefully reviewed all of plaintiff's arguments, we affirm the District Court's decisions for substantially the same reasons set forth in those decisions.

We have considered all of plaintiff's arguments on appeal and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.