From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Am. Contracting, LLC v. Olson Fencing, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 16, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03149-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 16, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-03149-PAB-BNB

2013-10-16

AMERICAN CONTRACTING, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. OLSON FENCING, INC., a Wyoming corporation, Defendant.


Judge Philip A. Brimmer


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland filed on September 26, 2013 [Docket No. 37]. The Recommendation states that objections to the Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after its service on the parties. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Recommendation was served on September 26, 2013. No party has objected to the Recommendation.

In the absence of an objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge's recommendation under any standard it deems appropriate. See Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) ("[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings"). In this matter, the Court has reviewed the Recommendation to satisfy itself that there is "no clear error on the face of the record." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes. Based on this review, the Court has concluded that the Recommendation is a correct application of the facts and the law. Accordingly, it is

This standard of review is something less than a "clearly erroneous or contrary to law" standard of review, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), which in turn is less than a de novo review. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 37] is ACCEPTED.

2. Plaintiff's Verified Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [Docket No. 34] is denied without prejudice.

BY THE COURT:

________________________

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Am. Contracting, LLC v. Olson Fencing, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 16, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03149-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Am. Contracting, LLC v. Olson Fencing, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AMERICAN CONTRACTING, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 16, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-03149-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 16, 2013)