Summary
considering whether this Court erred in quashing appeal pursuant to Walker where "[p]etitioner failed to file a notice of appeal at a separate docket number in a consolidated case, when [p]etitioner filed separate notices of appeal at the consolidated docket number, as directed and required by the trial court"
Summary of this case from Vazquez v. GJO Props. LLCOpinion
No. 436 WAL 2019 No. 437 WAL 2019 No. 438 WAL 2019
06-01-2020
ALWAYS BUSY CONSULTING, LLC, Petitioner v. BABFORD & COMPANY, INC., Respondent Always Busy Consulting, LLC, Petitioner v. Babford & Company, Inc., Respondent Always Busy Consulting, LLC, Petitioner v. Babford & Company, Inc., Respondent
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court err in quashing Petitioner's appeal pursuant to Commonwealth v. Walker, 646 Pa. 456, 185 A.3d 969 (2018), on the basis that Petitioner failed to file a notice of appeal at a separate docket number in a consolidated case, when Petitioner filed separate notices of appeal at the consolidated docket number, as directed and required by the trial court?