Because Plaintiff's race discrimination and national origin discrimination claims arise out of the same facts, and because courts have observed that the line between race and national origin is an "extremely difficult one to trace", the Court will analyze these claims together. See Alvarado v. Boca Raton Cmty. Hosp., 2010 WL 3941826, at *10 n. 7 (S.D.Fla. Oct.6, 2010) (citations omitted). --------

Dkt. 17-1. Although he does not mention national origin in his EEOC charge, it is clear the same facts give rise to Count III in his complaint. See Alvarado v. Boca Raton Cmty. Hosp., 2010 WL 3941826, at *10 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 6, 2010) (finding there was no failure to exhaust administrative remedies because "the evidence remains the same with respect to both the national origin and race discrimination claims, thus any investigation by the EEOC into either race or national origin discrimination would have revealed the same evidence"). Moreover, courts have found it difficult to distinguish between national origin and race discrimination because they are often factually identical.