From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alum-A-Lift, Inc. v. Arkansas Best Corporation

United States District Court, N.D. California
Nov 21, 2007
Case No. 07-cv-5555-MMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 07-cv-5555-MMC.

November 21, 2007

Samuel R. Miller (SBN 66871), Ryan M. Sandrock, Paul L. Yanosy (SBN 233014), SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, San Francisco, California.

Steven A. Ellis (SBN 171742), SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, Los Angeles, California, Attorneys For Defendant, FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX FREIGHT CORPORATION.


[PROPOSED] ORDER


For the reasons set forth in the Joint Stipulation Regarding Response to Complaint Pending Decision on MDL Motion, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that the deadline for the Defendants to respond to the Complaint in this matter shall be extended until the earlier of the following three dates: (1) forty-five days after the filing in the MDL transferee court of a Consolidated Amended Complaint in the LTL Shipping Services Antitrust Cases; (2) forty-five days after Plaintiffs provide written notice to Defendants that they do not intend to file a Consolidated Amended Complaint, provided that such notice may be given only at or after the initial case management conference in the MDL transferee court; or (3) such other date as set by the MDL transferee court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Alum-A-Lift, Inc. v. Arkansas Best Corporation

United States District Court, N.D. California
Nov 21, 2007
Case No. 07-cv-5555-MMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2007)
Case details for

Alum-A-Lift, Inc. v. Arkansas Best Corporation

Case Details

Full title:ALUM-A-LIFT, INC., Plaintiff, v. ARKANSAS BEST CORPORATION, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Nov 21, 2007

Citations

Case No. 07-cv-5555-MMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2007)