Opinion
Argued March 13, 1893
Decided March 21, 1893
Norris Morey for appellants.
Wm. F. Cogswell for respondent.
Per Curiam opinion for dismissal of appeal.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Altman v. Hofeller
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 21, 1893
33 N.E. 601 (N.Y. 1893)
Summaries of
Altman v. Hofeller
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 21, 1893
33 N.E. 601 (N.Y. 1893)
Case details for
Altman v. Hofeller
Case Details
Full title:ISAAC ALTMAN et al., as Administrators, etc., Appellants, v . ELI…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 21, 1893
Citations
33 N.E. 601 (N.Y. 1893)
33 N.E. 601
51 N.Y. St. Rptr. 197
Citing Cases
Chudnowsky v. Re-Mo Holding Corp.
And further said (p. 551): "The question is not one of terms, or of sessions of the court." (See, also,…
Altman v. HofellerFrom this provision in the order the plaintiffs appealed to this court, where the appeal was dismissed upon…