From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alterio v. Rushmore Loan Servs. Ditech Wilmington Tr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 28, 2020
20-CV-0143 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. May. 28, 2020)

Opinion

20-CV-0143 (CM)

05-28-2020

JUDITH ALTERIO, Plaintiff, v. RUSHMORE LOAN SERVICES DITECH WILMINGTON TRUST, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL :

By order dated February 14, 2020, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within sixty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: May 28, 2020

New York, New York

/s/_________

COLLEEN McMAHON

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Alterio v. Rushmore Loan Servs. Ditech Wilmington Tr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 28, 2020
20-CV-0143 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. May. 28, 2020)
Case details for

Alterio v. Rushmore Loan Servs. Ditech Wilmington Tr.

Case Details

Full title:JUDITH ALTERIO, Plaintiff, v. RUSHMORE LOAN SERVICES DITECH WILMINGTON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 28, 2020

Citations

20-CV-0143 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. May. 28, 2020)