From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Altena v. Ansary

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 26, 2022
2:21-cv-10013-SSS-JEMx (C.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-10013-SSS-JEMx

09-26-2022

Sabine Altena v. Nina Ansary


Present: The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES- GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed Against Plaintiff's and Defendant's Counsel for Failure to File a Rule 26(f) Report

On July 18, 2022, the Court issued an order setting the Scheduling Conference for October 7, 2022 [Dkt. 51]. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are to file their Joint Rule 26(f) Report not later than 14 days before the Scheduling Conference. As of today's date, the parties have not filed a Joint Rule 26(f) Report.

Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS counsel for Plaintiff, Gregory B. Koltun; Benjamin J. Fox; and James I. McClammy, and counsel for Defendant, Susheel Kirpalani and Razmig Izakelian, to show cause why they should not each be sanctioned in the amount of $250 for their failure to file a timely Joint Rule 26(f) Report. Counsel are DIRECTED to respond in writing to this Order to Show Cause by Monday, October 3, 2022, at 12:00 noon. Counsel's failure to respond-or counsel's filing of an inadequate response-may result in the imposition of additional sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Altena v. Ansary

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 26, 2022
2:21-cv-10013-SSS-JEMx (C.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Altena v. Ansary

Case Details

Full title:Sabine Altena v. Nina Ansary

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Sep 26, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-10013-SSS-JEMx (C.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2022)