From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A.L.T. v. D.O.K.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Sep 20, 2022
652 S.W.3d 792 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. ED 110144

09-20-2022

A.L.T., Respondent, v. D.O.K., Appellant.

David O'Connell, 223 N. Main Street, St. Charles, MO 63301, for Respondent. Steven A. Waterkotte, 7750 Clayton Road, Suite 209, St. Louis, MO 63117, for Appellant.


David O'Connell, 223 N. Main Street, St. Charles, MO 63301, for Respondent.

Steven A. Waterkotte, 7750 Clayton Road, Suite 209, St. Louis, MO 63117, for Appellant.

Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

D.O.K. appeals from the trial court's Judgment and entry of a full order of protection in favor of A.L.T., pursuant to the Missouri Adult Abuse Act (MAAA), Sections 455.010 et seq. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

A.L.T. v. D.O.K.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Sep 20, 2022
652 S.W.3d 792 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

A.L.T. v. D.O.K.

Case Details

Full title:A.L.T., Respondent, v. D.O.K., Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Sep 20, 2022

Citations

652 S.W.3d 792 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)