From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alphonso v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Dec 7, 2011
373 P.3d 890 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 58878.

12-07-2011

Julio David ALPHONSO a/k/a Julio David Alfonso, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Julio David Alphonso Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney


Julio David Alphonso

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a proper person appeal from an order of the district court denying a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus . Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michelle Leavitt, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See

In his petition filed on September 14, 2010, appellant challenged the validity of his judgment of conviction in district court case number C092829. The petition was not cognizable; however, because appellant was not in custody in the case designated when he filed the petition. Jackson v. State, 115 Nev. 21, 23, 973 P.2d 241, 242 (1999) ; see also Nev. Const. art. 6, § 6 (1) (providing that the district courts may issue a writ of habeas corpus on petition by “any person who is held in actual custody in their respective districts, or who has suffered a criminal conviction in their respective districts and has not completed the sentence imposed pursuant to the judgment of conviction”). Therefore, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).


Summaries of

Alphonso v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Dec 7, 2011
373 P.3d 890 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Alphonso v. State

Case Details

Full title:Julio David ALPHONSO a/k/a Julio David Alfonso, Appellant, v. The STATE of…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Dec 7, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 890 (Nev. 2011)

Citing Cases

Alphonso v. Jarvis

The state courts recently denied state post-conviction relief because petitioner neither currently was in…