Opinion
Argued May 5, 1941 —
Decided September 19, 1941.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 126 N.J.L. 233.
For the respondent, R.E. A.D. Watson.
For the appellants, Paul W. Ewing.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.