From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alper v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 27, 1996
228 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

June 27, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Fern Fisher-Brandveen, J.).


Petitioners' claim that they were ignorant of the law is not a valid excuse for failure to serve a notice of claim timely ( Matter of Tricomi v. New York City Hous. Auth., 191 A.D.2d 447). Renewal on the basis of the different excuse that an alleged confrontation between one of the petitioners and a City employee caused the former to delay commencement of legal proceedings out of fear of retaliation by the latter was properly denied on the ground that the new facts were known at the time of the original application.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Alper v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 27, 1996
228 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Alper v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:DEXTER ALPER et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 27, 1996

Citations

228 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
644 N.Y.S.2d 623

Citing Cases

Torres v. City of N.Y.

The City's contention that petitioner has not provided any authorizations enabling it to obtain the necessary…

Sinatra v. City of N.Y.

(See Matter of Rivera v NY City Hous. Auth., 25 AD3d 450 [1st Dept 2006]). Additionally, ignorance of the law…