From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alonzo v. Stansbury

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 6, 2022
2:21-cv-06675-SB-MRW (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-06675-SB-MRW

05-06-2022

THUY THANH ALONZO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ARMAND STANSBURY d/b/a STANSBURY COLLECTION; and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, Defendants.


Complaint filed: August 18, 2021

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(A)(1)

Hon. Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. United States District Judge

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

Upon due consideration, good cause appearing, the Court DISMISSES this action with prejudice as to Plaintiff's claims and without prejudice as to the claims of the purported class. Each party shall bear its own costs, experts' fees, attorneys' fees, and attorneys' expense. The Clerk of Court is instructed to terminate all pending motions and deadlines, and close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Alonzo v. Stansbury

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 6, 2022
2:21-cv-06675-SB-MRW (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Alonzo v. Stansbury

Case Details

Full title:THUY THANH ALONZO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 6, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-06675-SB-MRW (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2022)