From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alo v. Ramos

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 3, 2023
1:23-cv-00663-JLT-SAB (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-00663-JLT-SAB

05-03-2023

ALCAPONE ALO, Plaintiff, v. ASHLEY RAMOS, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

(ECF NO. 2)

Plaintiff Alcapone Alo (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action on May 1, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee in this action and instead filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) The Court finds Plaintiff's application demonstrates entitlement to proceed without prepayment of fees. Notwithstanding this order, the Court does not direct that service be undertaken until the Court screens the complaint in due course and issues its screening order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED.

2. Service shall not be undertaken until the Court screens the complaint in due course and issues its screening order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Alo v. Ramos

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 3, 2023
1:23-cv-00663-JLT-SAB (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Alo v. Ramos

Case Details

Full title:ALCAPONE ALO, Plaintiff, v. ASHLEY RAMOS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 3, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-00663-JLT-SAB (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2023)