From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Almanza v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 26, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2808 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-2808 KJN P

03-26-2013

THOMAS MARIO ALMANZA, III, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.


ORDER

On February 11, 2013, petitioner filed an opposition to respondent's request for extension of time, and requested that the court expedite ruling on the instant petition based on petitioner's anticipated release date of October 27, 2013. However, as noted by petitioner, the court has discretion to grant extensions of time. By order filed January 31, 2013, respondent was granted until March 29, 2013, in which to file a responsive pleading. Moreover, the court cannot rule on the petition until the record is complete. Thus, the court denies petitioner's motion. However, respondent is cautioned that no further extensions of time will be granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion (dkt. no. 12) is denied without prejudice.

__________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Almanza v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 26, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2808 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Almanza v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS MARIO ALMANZA, III, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 26, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-2808 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2013)