From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Thacher

United States District Court, C.D. California
May 16, 2011
CV 08-3326-RSWL (FMOx) (C.D. Cal. May. 16, 2011)

Opinion

CV 08-3326-RSWL (FMOx).

May 16, 2011


ORDER


On March 1, 2011, the Court held a status conference regarding this Action and vacated the court trial set for March 15, 2011. Counsel for both parties informed the Court that they would meet and confer to discuss how they intend to proceed with this Action. The Court is now in receipt of the Joint Status Report submitted by Plaintiff Allstate Insurance Company and Defendants Richard Thacher, Valerie Ann Thacher, and Guadalupe Trujillo [234]. Plaintiff Allstate has informed the Court that it elects to have this case proceed as a trial de novo. On the other hand, Defendants have informed the Court that they would like to proceed with a court trial on the Court's determination of damages only.

While the Court found that the damages awarded to Defendant Trujillo in the arbitration were unconscionable in light of Defendant's actual injuries and the settlement figures proposed initially, upon further review, the Court finds that proceeding with a trial de novo could lead to a similar verdict to the one returned by the jury in the first trial.

Specifically, the jury could not determine the amount of damages to award to the Defendants. Rather, the jury was limited to determining whether the arbitration award was unreasonable or the product of fraud or collusion. The jury in a new trial will be limited to resolving this same issue, which could potentially lead to a similar verdict to the one returned by the jury in the first trial.

As such, in the interests of judicial economy, the Court informs the parties that it is now contemplating vacating its November 23, 2009 Order [196] granting Plaintiff's Motion for a New Trial on the sole issue of damages as well as the Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment. The Court would instead reinstate the September 18, 2009 Judgment [173], and that Judgment would then serve as a final judgment that may be reviewed upon appeal.

Accordingly, the Court orders the parties to submit their position papers with respect to the Court's position stated in this Order on or before May 31, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Thacher

United States District Court, C.D. California
May 16, 2011
CV 08-3326-RSWL (FMOx) (C.D. Cal. May. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Thacher

Case Details

Full title:Allstate Insurance Co., Plaintiff, v. Richard Thacher, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, C.D. California

Date published: May 16, 2011

Citations

CV 08-3326-RSWL (FMOx) (C.D. Cal. May. 16, 2011)