From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alls v. Stansberry

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 8, 2010
396 F. App'x 932 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-6510.

Submitted: September 30, 2010.

Decided: October 8, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00506-LMB-TRJ).

Marcus Alls, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Marcus Alls, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alls v. Stansberry, No. 1:09-cv-00506-LMB-TRJ, 2010 WL 723034 (E.D.Va. Mar. 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Alls v. Stansberry

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 8, 2010
396 F. App'x 932 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Alls v. Stansberry

Case Details

Full title:Marcus ALLS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Patricia R. STANSBERRY, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 8, 2010

Citations

396 F. App'x 932 (4th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Wheelock v. Wilson

Respondent is entitled to the summary judgment he seeks because, as other courts have held in considering…

Toney v. Wilson

Pet. 3, 8. Respondent is entitled to the summary judgment he seeks because, as other courts have held in…