From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allmond v. Frederick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 19, 2013
Case No. 1:13-cv-680 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 19, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:13-cv-680

12-19-2013

JAMAL ALLMOND, Plaintiff, v. DAWN FREDERICK, et al., Defendants.


Weber, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.


REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff has filed a complaint against defendants Dawn Frederick, K. Parker, M. Stuntebeck, C. Davis, and D. Morgan. (Doc. 3). On November 20, 2013, the undersigned issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the complaint be dismissed against all defendants for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. 5). This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 6).

In the motion, plaintiff claims that he filed individual complaint forms for each defendant named in the complaint and requests the Court to consolidate his claims into one case. See id. Plaintiff did submit multiple complaint forms in this case, each containing identical factual allegations but listing the defendants in different order. However, because plaintiff fails to allege any facts which cure the deficiencies set forth in the Court's November 20, 2013 Report and Recommendation his motion to amend the complaint should be denied.

The multiple complaint forms were docketed as service copies in this case because of the identical factual allegations.

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Doc. 6) be DENIED.

________________

Karen L. Litkovitz

United States Magistrate Judge
JAMAL ALLMOND,

Plaintiff,

vs DAWN FREDERICK, et al,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:13-cv-680


Weber, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.


NOTICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), any party may serve and file specific, written objections to this Report & Recommendation ("R&R") within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS after being served with a copy thereof. That period may be extended further by the Court on timely motion by either side for an extension of time. All objections shall specify the portion(s) of the R&R objected to, and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. A party shall respond to an opponent's objections within FOURTEEN DAYS after being served with a copy of those objections. Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION

¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.

¦ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you.

¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits.

1. Article Addressed to:

2. Article Number

(Transfer from service label)

7011 3500 0001 5345 9794


COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY

A. Signature

×

[] Agent

[] Addressee

B. Received by (Printed Name)

C. Date of Delivery

D. Is delivery address different from item 1? [] Yes

If YES, enter delivery address below: [] No

3. Senvic Type

[] Certified Mail

[] Express Mail

[] Registered

[] Return Receipt for Merchandise

[] Insured Mail

[] C.O.D.


4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes


Summaries of

Allmond v. Frederick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 19, 2013
Case No. 1:13-cv-680 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Allmond v. Frederick

Case Details

Full title:JAMAL ALLMOND, Plaintiff, v. DAWN FREDERICK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 19, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:13-cv-680 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 19, 2013)