From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alliedbarton Sec. Servs., LLC v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mar 13, 2017
No. 72343 (Nev. App. Mar. 13, 2017)

Opinion

No. 72343

03-13-2017

ALLIEDBARTON SECURITY SERVICES, LLC, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE DAVID M. JONES, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and SHAE RATHBUN, Real Party in Interest.


ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION

This is an original petition for a writ of prohibition challenging the district court's decision to voluntarily recuse itself from the underlying action.

This court may issue a writ of prohibition to arrest the proceedings of a district court exercising its judicial functions when such proceedings are in excess of the district court's jurisdiction. See NRS 34.320; Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). In particular, a writ of prohibition is an appropriate avenue to challenge a district court's voluntary recusal from a case. See Ham v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 93 Nev. 409, 412, 566 P.2d 420, 422 (1977). Nevertheless, it is petitioner's burden to demonstrate that extraordinary relief is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Having considered the petition and appendix, we conclude that petitioner has not demonstrated that our intervention by way of extraordinary writ relief is warranted in this matter. See Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851 (explaining that whether to consider a writ petition is a matter within this court's discretion). Unlike in Ham, the district court's decision to voluntarily recuse itself from the underlying action was based on "reasons which reasonably appear to be judicially warranted." 93 Nev. at 415, 566 P.2d at 424. Moreover, we have reviewed the other authority presented by petitioner and conclude that it does not demonstrate that voluntary recusal was prohibited in this matter. Accordingly, we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1).

It is so ORDERED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. David M. Jones, District Judge

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP/Las Vegas

Maier Gutierrez Ayon, PLLC

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Alliedbarton Sec. Servs., LLC v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mar 13, 2017
No. 72343 (Nev. App. Mar. 13, 2017)
Case details for

Alliedbarton Sec. Servs., LLC v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Case Details

Full title:ALLIEDBARTON SECURITY SERVICES, LLC, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 13, 2017

Citations

No. 72343 (Nev. App. Mar. 13, 2017)