From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allied Professionals, Inc. v. Malcolm

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Nov 26, 2001
Civil No. 01-1534 (DWF/AJB) (D. Minn. Nov. 26, 2001)

Opinion

Civil No. 01-1534 (DWF/AJB).

November 26, 2001

Rich Ostlund, Esq., Anthony Ostlund Baer, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs.

Ann Beimdiek Kinsella, Esq., Tom Bailey, Esq., and Frank Ling, Esq., Office of the Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, appeared on behalf of Defendants.


AMENDED ORDER


On November 21, 2001, this Court issued an order in the above-entitled matter; that order granted in part Plaintiffs' request for a preliminary injunction. Specifically, the Court enjoined enforcement of the last sentence of Section 2, subd. 6, of 2001 Minnesota Laws, 1st Special Session, Chapter 9, Article 7 (entitled "Regulation of Supplemental Nursing Services Agencies), adopted by the Minnesota Legislature on June 29, 2001, and signed into law by Governor Jesse Ventura on June 30, 2001 ("the Act"). The Court further vacated, effective immediately, an earlier temporary restraining order.

At the request of the parties, the Court hereby clarifies its position as to the vacation of the temporary restraining order. The Court understands that the effect of the November 21, 2001, order is to allow the Defendants to enforce a variety of regulations contained in the Act as against the Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs have asserted that many of these provisions are unconstitutional and that the effect of enforcing them will be irreparable harm to the Plaintiffs. The Court, however, determines that no stay of the enforcement of the preliminary injunction or stay of the vacation of the temporary restraining order is necessary.

The Court makes that determination based on the representation of the Defendants that, although the Defendants may begin administrative implementation of the Act (with the exception of the one provision enjoined), the Defendants will not enforce the Act as against the Plaintiffs until at least January 2, 2002. The Court understands that the Defendants will begin the process of registering SNSAs, assessing fees, engaging in background checks, etc. However, other provisions — such as the wage cap and the hour requirements will not be enforced until at least January 2, 2002.

The reason for the delay in enforcement is the need to undertake administrative prerequisites to enforcement; the effect of the delay is that there is no need to stay vacation of the temporary restraining order. Accordingly, the Court incorporates the above reasoning into the memorandum accompanying the November 21, 2001, order, and issues the following amended order.

For the reasons stated, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Temporary Restraining Order dated August 30, 2001 (Doc. No. 28) is VACATED;

2. Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 61) is GRANTED IN PART as follows:

a. Defendants are hereby enjoined from administering and enforcing the last sentence of Section 2, subd. 6, of 2001 Minnesota Laws, 1st Special Session, Chapter 9, Article 7 (entitled "Regulation of Supplemental Nursing Services Agencies), adopted by the Minnesota Legislature on June 29, 2001, and signed into law by Governor Jesse Ventura on June 30, 2001.

b. Plaintiffs are not required to post a bond.

3. Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction is in all other respects denied.

4. In light of the representations of the Defendants that they will not enforce the regulations at issue as against the Plaintiffs until January 2, 2002, the provisions of this order are effective immediately.


Summaries of

Allied Professionals, Inc. v. Malcolm

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Nov 26, 2001
Civil No. 01-1534 (DWF/AJB) (D. Minn. Nov. 26, 2001)
Case details for

Allied Professionals, Inc. v. Malcolm

Case Details

Full title:Allied Professionals, Inc.; CareMate Corporation; Caring Needs, Inc.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Nov 26, 2001

Citations

Civil No. 01-1534 (DWF/AJB) (D. Minn. Nov. 26, 2001)