From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allied Leasing Corporation v. Murphy

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 25, 1977
233 S.E.2d 499 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

53422.

ARGUED FEBRUARY 3, 1977.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 25, 1977.

Action on contract. DeKalb Superior Court. Before Judge Dean.

Jerry L. Stepp, for appellants.

Webb, Parker, Young Ferguson, Thomas L. Murphy, for appellee.


An agreement, whereby a forty-acre tract of California real estate was sold with the guarantee that the sellers would resell the realty in one year for twice the plaintiff's purchase price, was a "security," defined by the Georgia Securities Act of 1957, § 1(i) (Ga. L. 1957, pp. 134, 136; Code Ann. § 97-102 (i) as, inter alia, "any ... investment contract, ... (or) beneficial interest in title to property, ..." The above transaction falls within the framework of one or more, or a combination, of the four tests for the existence of securities recognized in Jaciewicki v. Gordarl Associates, 132 Ga. App. 888, 891 ( 209 S.E.2d 693) (1975).

Accordingly, the trial judge did not err in granting the plaintiff buyer's motion for summary judgment in his action against the defendant sellers for damages for the sale of the above security, which was unregistered.

Judgment affirmed. Quillian, P. J., and Shulman, J., concur.

ARGUED FEBRUARY 3, 1977 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 25, 1977.


Summaries of

Allied Leasing Corporation v. Murphy

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 25, 1977
233 S.E.2d 499 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Allied Leasing Corporation v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:ALLIED LEASING CORPORATION et al. v. MURPHY

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 25, 1977

Citations

233 S.E.2d 499 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)
141 Ga. App. 424

Citing Cases

D. K. Properties, Inc. v. Osborne

The limited partnership agreement there provided that "the general partners [syndicators] shall be the…

Opinion No. MW-152

It is generally recognized that the term `securities' embraces `any and all evidences of debt.' Huckabee v.…