In each case the court held there was sufficient proof to sustain a verdict upholding the will. The rule stated in Poindexter's Adm'r v. Alexander, 277 Ky. 147, 125 S.W.2d 981, and in the earlier cases of Allegeyer v. Allegeyer's Ex'rs, 244 Ky. 450, 51 S.W.2d 445, and Caddell's Heirs v. Caddell's Ex'x, 175 Ky. 505, 194 S.W. 541, giving effect to recitations in the attestation clause with respect to compliance with the formalities of execution, is consistent with the proposition that if an attesting witness identifies his signature proof of the proper execution may be supplied from other sources. The attestation clause is treated as an acceptable source of proof because it is a solemn recitation of compliance with the statutory formalities.
" To the same effect is Allgeyer v. Allgeyer's Executor, 244 Ky. 450, 51 S.W.2d 445, where the court on precisely the facts we have here, again said this: "The court did not settle or certify what was said in the argument to the jury.
4. Complaint is further made of some impropriety of the defendant's counsel in having read or referred to a portion of a medical text-book in his argument. Waiving the question as to whether this matter is sufficiently presented by the bill of exceptions, the judge certifying only that it was claimed by the plaintiff that such had been done (see Allgeyer v. Allgeyer's Executors, 244 Ky. 450, 51 S.W.2d 445), we may say that after a consideration of the facts we can see no merit in this point. It appearing that the plaintiff received a fair trial of his cause, the judgment is affirmed.